Randall J. Lopez 
You can debate PC vs. Mac until the cows come home and you’ll by no means discover a right or incorrect answer, so I’m going to present you with a few statistics and let you make your very own decisions. To come up with a historical past piece, I am both a Mac and a PC user and will give you a sincere opinion on the professionals and cons of each.
Macs have been designed with one component in thought – layout work. They excel at photograph design, video production, and even audio work. This becomes 30 years in the past. Today they are still just as excellent as they have been for all of the above functions. However, that’s the quantity of what they can do until the switch from the IBM Power PC processors to the new Intel primarily based Macs, at the least. Now they can do greater – if you take gain of the Boot Camp feature and twin boot Mac OSX with Windows XP. That opens up a whole new realm of opportunities as the road between Mac and PC turns much less clean.
PCs were designed with one thing in mind as properly – commercial enterprise apps. PCs were terrible at enhancing pix, producing video, and editing audio. That became additionally 30 years ago. With the video gaming industry constantly pushing the limits of what PCs can do, PC engineers had to reinvent the wheel to preserve up continuously. A result is a machine that can do the whole thing the Mac can do and extra. It is not simplest to run any Mac’s program (they make Windows variations of all of the famous Mac software programs); however, a PC also has the processing power to run all of the maximum number-crunching extensive commercial enterprise applications as properly.
Function versus design is definitely the query you ought to be asking yourself whilst seeking to determine on a Mac versus a PC. What are you going to be the usage of the computer for? Is it just going to be used for picture enhancing, or are you going to use it to play video games, surf the net, balance your checkbook, and email your customers? If your only subject is in the artistic line of work, then you’ll be higher off with a Mac. Keep in thoughts that specialization comes with a top-class, and you may now not be able to get yourself anything respectable for underneath $2,000.
On the other hand, if you need a gadget that may do the entirety, you are excellent off with a PC. They are reasonably priced, clean to restore, and have an install base of over ten instances that of a Mac, and you may find an awful lot more help for a PC. You can pick out up a similar PC for around $800, that even though it lasts for 2 years versus the common five years to a Mac (observe those numbers are skewed, but I’ll use them for simplicity’s sake), you could purchase another PC to update an old one and now have spent less than buying a single Mac.
Support is likewise some other difficulty. There isn’t any scarcity of support for PCs, be it software program issues or hardware problems. Every most important retail outlet has its very own in-residence tech help crew, which could restore any problem. Macs alternatively require an Apple “Genius” assistance who, though specialized in Apple merchandise, is more expensive and much less in amount than a PC specialist. On an aspect note, I wanted to say something approximately viruses. If you are not connecting to the net in any respect and aren’t using “warez” or pirated software, you definitely have NO chance of getting viruses. It doesn’t remember whether or not you’re on a PC or a Mac because the ones are the simplest points of access for viruses.
There are several Mac viruses as of this date, albeit now not ones that might be existence-threatening. The cause for that is the setup base of the Mac versus the PC. There are over ten instances of the number of users of a PC over a Mac, and therefore they’re targeted as they should be. Although, if you do not connect with the internet or use illegal software, then your chance of viruses is decreased to none.
Another factor that I would like to mention is that Apple is currently being sued for false advertising and marketing on their notebooks and their purported display screen resolutions. Contrary to the PC, they may be no longer capable of displaying genuine 32-bit sixteen.7 million shades. Apple’s claims to the number of colors their notebooks are viable of the display area due to a dithering software approach. This gives the phantasm of more colorations by causing adjoining pixels to display one-of-a-kind sunglasses of color and fools the eye into seeing something that isn’t always there. This is executed via Apple because their notebooks use a 6-bit display instead of the 8-bit show that PC-based notebooks use.
Although this lawsuit is new, the difficulty isn’t. Macs were using 6-bit shows in their notebooks for years now, but it’s only come to light lately. And Apple is no stranger to complaints as properly. They have always made statements approximately the overall performance in their computers being a lot more than they’re in reality capable of and have needed to dispose of their statements from their internet site and distinct advertising campaigns consistently. I’m making here that you must now not pay attention to Apple about them telling you what their machines can do because they were stuck mendacity quite a few times. Instead, you need to talk to a person who uses the product and get the statistics.
Lastly, I need to evaluate prices. Briefly, I cited numbers earlier, but that became for the average desktop. Laptops/Notebooks are markedly more costly. Still, the PC wins out as far as quality bang in your buck. It would help if you bought an HP laptop to have extra strength than you need for photo enhancing for around $1200 at any important retail chain – not to mention how an awful lot cheaper in case you undergo on-line stores. On the other hand, a MacBook Pro sells for $2,000 for the low-cease 15″ version.
As I actually have said earlier, I am each a Mac person and a PC person, and even though it can appear that I even have a PC slant to my critiques, it’s far simplest because I sift via the nonsense and know all my facts. The Mac is tremendous for what it is designed for – artistic design paintings. The PC is super for what it is (presently) designed for – the whole thing. The debate will keep to move on, but my advice is that this – see what you could afford, determine what you want to use the machine for, attempt each out at a shop, and notice which you are extra cozy with after which purchase whichever system fits your desires pleasant.
